Taking on Direct Instruction

Nashville education writer TC Weber takes on the latest new old craze making waves over at the Tennessee Star: Direct Instruction.

What concerns me isn’t necessarily the existence of Direct Instruction.

It’s the assumption that it should become the dominant model everywhere.

Education reformers often fall in love with universal solutions.

Teachers know better.

Students are different.

Schools are different.

Communities are different.

What works in one classroom may fail spectacularly in another.

That’s why good teachers employ multiple strategies.

They adapt.

They adjust.

They respond.

They don’t simply read scripts.

And that’s where Direct Instruction starts making me nervous.

A heavily scripted curriculum inevitably diminishes teacher autonomy.

cityscape of nashville tennessee at dawn
Photo by Cesar G on Pexels.com

MORE EDUCATION NEWS

Trump Voucher Scheme Becomes Boon for Billionaires

Tennessee Kids Lose as Super Bowl Comes to Nashville

A Note on the “Success Sequence”

Perhaps an unintended consequence?

Chalkbeat reports:

Tennessee public schools could soon be required to teach the “success sequence” – that the keys to future success are to graduate high school; enter the workforce or pursue postsecondary education; marry, and then have children. The state joins others around the country introducing legislation around the controversial education idea.

That’s all well and good, but Peter Greene digs a little deeper to explain:

The clear, logical implication of the sequence is that teenaged girls should be on birth control until they have reached the proper moment in the sequence. Heck, the success sequence is practically a full-on endorsement of the “I’m not ready for a child yet” case for legal abortion. If you are pushing the sequence as a practical plan for success in life, then it only makes sense to allow teenagers the practical tools that will help them postpone having a child until they’re at the right point in the sequence.

Yes, many sequencers like to use the idea to sell abstinence, and that tips the hand of the real idea for many sequencers–that the success sequence is not a practical plan to achieve desired outcomes, but a moral test to see who deserves those “success” outcomes. For some it is another way to make the argument that poor folks are poor because of their own lousy choices, and if you don’t want to be poor, make better choices.

MORE EDUCATION NEWS

Vouchers are Bad: Very Bad

Christian Nationalism and American Public Schools